9.6.5 Generic Function and Method Examples

Consider the following definitions:

(define-generic G)
(define-method (G (a <integer>) b) 'integer)
(define-method (G (a <real>) b) 'real)
(define-method (G a b) 'top)

The define-generic call defines G as a generic function. The three next lines define methods for G. Each method uses a sequence of parameter specializers that specify when the given method is applicable. A specializer permits to indicate the class a parameter must belong to (directly or indirectly) to be applicable. If no specializer is given, the system defaults it to <top>. Thus, the first method definition is equivalent to

(define-method (G (a <integer>) (b <top>)) 'integer)

Now, let’s look at some possible calls to the generic function G:

(G 2 3)    ⇒ integer
(G 2 #t)   ⇒ integer
(G 1.2 'a) ⇒ real
(G #t #f)  ⇒ top
(G 1 2 3)  ⇒ error (since no method exists for 3 parameters)

The methods above use only one specializer per parameter list. But in general, any or all of a method’s parameters may be specialized. Suppose we define now:

(define-method (G (a <integer>) (b <number>))  'integer-number)
(define-method (G (a <integer>) (b <real>))    'integer-real)
(define-method (G (a <integer>) (b <integer>)) 'integer-integer)
(define-method (G a (b <number>))              'top-number)

With these definitions:

(G 1 2)   ⇒ integer-integer
(G 1 1.0) ⇒ integer-real
(G 1 #t)  ⇒ integer
(G 'a 1)  ⇒ top-number

As a further example we shall continue to define operations on the <my-complex> class. Suppose that we want to use it to implement complex numbers completely. For instance a definition for the addition of two complex numbers could be

(define-method (new-+ (a <my-complex>) (b <my-complex>))
  (make-rectangular (+ (real-part a) (real-part b))
                    (+ (imag-part a) (imag-part b))))

To be sure that the + used in the method new-+ is the standard addition we can do:

(define-generic new-+)

(let ((+ +))
  (define-method (new-+ (a <my-complex>) (b <my-complex>))
    (make-rectangular (+ (real-part a) (real-part b))
                      (+ (imag-part a) (imag-part b)))))

The define-generic ensures here that new-+ will be defined in the global environment. Once this is done, we can add methods to the generic function new-+ which make a closure on the + symbol. A complete writing of the new-+ methods is shown in Figure 9.1.

(define-generic new-+)

(let ((+ +))

  (define-method (new-+ (a <real>) (b <real>)) (+ a b))

  (define-method (new-+ (a <real>) (b <my-complex>)) 
    (make-rectangular (+ a (real-part b)) (imag-part b)))

  (define-method (new-+ (a <my-complex>) (b <real>))
    (make-rectangular (+ (real-part a) b) (imag-part a)))

  (define-method (new-+ (a <my-complex>) (b <my-complex>))
    (make-rectangular (+ (real-part a) (real-part b))
                      (+ (imag-part a) (imag-part b))))

  (define-method (new-+ (a <number>))  a)
  
  (define-method (new-+) 0)

  (define-method (new-+ . args)
    (new-+ (car args) 
      (apply new-+ (cdr args)))))

(set! + new-+)

Figure 9.1: Extending + to handle complex numbers

We take advantage here of the fact that generic function are not obliged to have a fixed number of parameters. The four first methods implement dyadic addition. The fifth method says that the addition of a single element is this element itself. The sixth method says that using the addition with no parameter always return 0 (as is also true for the primitive +). The last method takes an arbitrary number of parameters(28). This method acts as a kind of reduce: it calls the dyadic addition on the car of the list and on the result of applying it on its rest. To finish, the set! permits to redefine the + symbol to our extended addition.

To conclude our implementation (integration?) of complex numbers, we could redefine standard Scheme predicates in the following manner:

(define-method (complex? c <my-complex>) #t)
(define-method (complex? c)           #f)

(define-method (number? n <number>) #t)
(define-method (number? n)          #f)
…

Standard primitives in which complex numbers are involved could also be redefined in the same manner.

This document was generated on February 3, 2012 using texi2html 5.0.