manpagez: man pages & more
info gawk
Home | html | info | man

gawk: Computed Regexps

 3.6 Using Dynamic Regexps
 The righthand side of a '~' or '!~' operator need not be a regexp
 constant (i.e., a string of characters between slashes).  It may be any
 expression.  The expression is evaluated and converted to a string if
 necessary; the contents of the string are then used as the regexp.  A
 regexp computed in this way is called a "dynamic regexp" or a "computed
      BEGIN { digits_regexp = "[[:digit:]]+" }
      $0 ~ digits_regexp    { print }
 This sets 'digits_regexp' to a regexp that describes one or more digits,
 and tests whether the input record matches this regexp.
      NOTE: When using the '~' and '!~' operators, be aware that there is
      a difference between a regexp constant enclosed in slashes and a
      string constant enclosed in double quotes.  If you are going to use
      a string constant, you have to understand that the string is, in
      essence, scanned _twice_: the first time when 'awk' reads your
      program, and the second time when it goes to match the string on
      the lefthand side of the operator with the pattern on the right.
      This is true of any string-valued expression (such as
      'digits_regexp', shown in the previous example), not just string
    What difference does it make if the string is scanned twice?  The
 answer has to do with escape sequences, and particularly with
 backslashes.  To get a backslash into a regular expression inside a
 string, you have to type two backslashes.
    For example, '/\*/' is a regexp constant for a literal '*'.  Only one
 backslash is needed.  To do the same thing with a string, you have to
 type '"\\*"'.  The first backslash escapes the second one so that the
 string actually contains the two characters '\' and '*'.
    Given that you can use both regexp and string constants to describe
 regular expressions, which should you use?  The answer is "regexp
 constants," for several reasons:
    * String constants are more complicated to write and more difficult
      to read.  Using regexp constants makes your programs less
      error-prone.  Not understanding the difference between the two
      kinds of constants is a common source of errors.
    * It is more efficient to use regexp constants.  'awk' can note that
      you have supplied a regexp and store it internally in a form that
      makes pattern matching more efficient.  When using a string
      constant, 'awk' must first convert the string into this internal
      form and then perform the pattern matching.
    * Using regexp constants is better form; it shows clearly that you
      intend a regexp match.
          Using '\n' in Bracket Expressions of Dynamic Regexps
    Some older versions of 'awk' do not allow the newline character to be
 used inside a bracket expression for a dynamic regexp:
      $ awk '$0 ~ "[ \t\n]"'
      error-> awk: newline in character class [
      error-> ]...
      error->  source line number 1
      error->  context is
      error->        $0 ~ "[ >>>  \t\n]" <<<
    But a newline in a regexp constant works with no problem:
      $ awk '$0 ~ /[ \t\n]/'
      here is a sample line
      -| here is a sample line
    'gawk' does not have this problem, and it isn't likely to occur often
 in practice, but it's worth noting for future reference.
© 2000-2018
Individual documents may contain additional copyright information.